Cases 1 - 10 of 629
Trujillo v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Fabian Trujillo
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob D. and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villamor v. Metcalfe et al
as 2:2024cv00940
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Fabian Villamor
Defendant:
Officer J. Metcalfe, Officer D. Ketring, Officer A. Bookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv02180
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz et al v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Isaac J. Ortiz, Lawrence P. Rivas, Angelo Tinoco and others
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Salamon et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Petitioner:
Fabian Alexander Cook
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLemore v. Saffold et al.
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Gregory McLemore
Defendant:
Atty. Jeffrey R. Saffold, Atty. Joseph V. Pagano and Dr. John Fabian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
