Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Skinner v. USA et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Frank Skinner
Defendant:
USA, John P Yates, Tomar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Unit Staff et al
as 1:2016cv04459
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bryant
Defendant:
Unit Staff, SIS Staff at FCI Terre Haute and Unit Team Staff at FCC Forrest City Medium
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Ginn v. C.V. Rivera
as 16-1881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas S. Ginn
Defendant - Appellee:
C.V. Rivera, Warden, FCC - Forrest City Low
Rashad Wearing v. Anthony Hayne
as 15-2270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rashad A. Wearing
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony Haynes, Warden, FCC- Forrest City
Darrell Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 15-2185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darrell Eugene Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, T. C. Outlaw, Former Warden, Nader Peikar, Doctor and others
Michael Simpson v. FCC Forrest City Low, et al
as 15-1775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Dale Simpson
Defendant - Appellee:
FCC Forrest City Low, Medical Department, B. Wooten, Registered Nurse, FCC Forrest City Low, M. Wingo, Physician Assistant, FCC Forrest City Low and others
Marvin Cobb v. T. C. Outlaw, et al
as 15-1379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Cobb
Defendant - Appellee:
T. C. Outlaw, Warden, Forrest City Complex, Ronald Smith, Safety Manager, FCC Forrest City and A. Haynes, Warden, FCC Forrest City
Simpson v. FCC Forrest City
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Simpson
Defendant:
FCC Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. FCC Forrest City et al
as 2:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jonathan I Hill
Defendant:
FCC Forrest City and Anthony Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
