Cases 1 - 10 of 2,619
McHenry v. Lumpkin
as 24-10481
Petitioner:
Jimmy Floyd McHenry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
United States v. Miller
as 24-7046
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FLOYD PRESTON MILLER, III
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Curtis Leroy Floyd
Defendant:
Happy Smith, Rick White, P. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Mas-Govt., MD Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Floyd County Adult Detention Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Alvin S. Chambers
Defendant:
Floyd County Adult Detention Sheriff Office, Sgt. Ms. Barton, Sgt. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Springer et al
as 1:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
Josh Springer, Brett Hendricks, . Zanger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. WARD
as 5:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGE IVEY, STG EDWARD FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downey v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Bryan Downey
Defendant:
T.K. Waters, W.H. Cox, Yoder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Gooding v. Parole Board, et al
as 24-1438
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Respondent:
PAROLE BOARD and MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
