Cases 1 - 10 of 472
BLAKLEY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLAKLEY
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, K. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00294
Petitioner:
MICHAEL W. MORGAN
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. REGAL et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
ALTON LEON TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL, FRANK VANIHEL and ERIC J. HOLCOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
TODD E. COVINGTON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, RANDALL, TRAVIS DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridley v. Vanihel et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daren Earl Ridley and Daren E Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, K Gilmore, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
MARK RUTHRAUFF
Defendant:
CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., CENTURION, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FINCHER v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
TRAVON FINCHER
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELLY v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
MARZONO SHELLY
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
OMAR DAVIS
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL, CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
