Cases 1 - 10 of 231
GOODEN v. PHAMS et al
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
JR JIMMY GOODEN
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WATSON, WARDEN PHAMS, CECIL SISKA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hale v. Westville Corr Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00673
Defendant:
Nurses, Liaw, Quinton Davis and others
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Michael O Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarber v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv02619
Defendant:
Bridgette Hays, Craig Schmidt, Frederick L Gooden and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE TARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gooden v. Eaton et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Charles Gooden
Defendant:
Patrick Eaton, Steve Smith and C. Keo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Gooden v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Anthony Gooden
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOODEN v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2024cv05440
Petitioner:
MAURICE GOODEN
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colburn Kelly v. Cody Jett, et al
as 24-10553
Plaintiff:
COLBURN CLIFTON GOODEN KELLY
Defendant:
CODY JETT and JONATHAN SMITH
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Gooden v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
