Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Khali M. Bey v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Khali M. Bey
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Department of Children and Family Services, Jocelin Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00500
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SMITH v. ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
CARLOS SAUL, MIKE GREENBURG, ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Occhino v. Greenburg et al
as 6:2017cv01793
Plaintiff:
David Occhino
Defendant:
Alexander Greenburg, Nathan Healey and Eric Dwyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenburger v. Roundtree
as 1:2017cv03295
Plaintiff:
Morgan Greenburger
Defendant:
Philip R. Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenburger v. Rutherford
as 1:2014cv05263
Plaintiff:
Morgan Greenburger
Defendant:
Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenburger v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03741
Plaintiff:
Morgan Greenburger
Defendant:
City of New York, Jason Hallock, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenburger v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
Morgan Greenburger
Defendant:
NYC Department of Corrections, Davies and Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenburger v. John Doe # 1 - Correctional Officer et al
as 1:2013cv08709
Plaintiff:
Morgan J. Greenburger
Defendant:
John Doe # 1 - Correctional Officer, John Doe # 2 - Correctional Officer, John Doe # 3 - Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Mcculligan v. Joseph Mazurkiewicz, et al
as 13-2833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MCCULLIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ, SCI Greenburg and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
