Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Diarra v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv04228
Plaintiff:
Moussa U'nra Diarra
Defendant:
Judge Latisha Dear Jackson, ROBERT LEONARD, Daniel M. Coursey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIARRA v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv04733
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NFA DIARRA
Defendant:
ROBERT LEONARD, GREGORY ADAM, DANIEL M. COURSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diarra v. George W. Bush et al
as 4:2024cv02501
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Dr. Stacy Brown, Sgt. Friday and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa U'nfa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madej v. Garland et al
as 5:2022cv03303
Petitioner:
Gregory Adam Madej and Grzegorz Adam Madej
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Long et al
as 1:2022cv03492
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Ann Long, Gregory Adams, Laura Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Boston et al
as 1:2022cv02988
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Sherry Boston, Joshua M. Geller, Helen Pott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams-Bey v. McMahon et al
as 5:2017ct03264
Plaintiff:
Gregory Adams-Bey
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon and Officer Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams-Bey v. McMahon et al
as 5:2017ct03169
Plaintiff:
Gregory Adams-Bey
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, New Hanover County and Officer Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams-Bey v. Rogers et al
as 3:2017cv00210
Plaintiff:
Gregory Adams-Bey
Defendant:
FNU Rogers, FNU Gibbs, FNU Adams and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
