Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robert Gillens v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6227
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director, DOE #1, unknown mail staff/supervisor, KENNETH CRADDOCK, Discipline Hearing Officer and others
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DOE #1, K. CRADDOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Farmer v. BOP Director
as 22-6365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR, REGIONAL, WARDEN, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and others
Mitchell v. Skinner et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Defendant:
Officer Pitt, Vernon Byrd, R. Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Farmer v. BOP Director et al
as 3:2021cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah S. Farmer
Defendant:
BOP Director, Regional, U.S.P. Hazelton Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Compton v. Riffle et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Trae Javar Compton
Defendant:
Riffle, J. Hunt, K. Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winstead v. Brinson et al
as 1:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Wallace Sharik Winstead
Defendant:
Lieutenant Brinson, Lieutenant Stauffer, Correctional Officer Goldizen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Griffin et al v. Terry Collins et al
as 2:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mark Griffin, Sr., David A. Hess and Thomas Griffin
Defendant:
Terry Collins, M. Eberlin-Miller and W. Hixenbaugh
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hess et al v. Griffin et al
as 1:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Mark Griffin, Sr., David A. Hess and Thomas Griffin
Defendant:
Terry Collins, M. Eberlin-Miller and W. Hixenbaugh
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
