Cases 1 - 10 of 137
VANDERFORD v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
PERRY GENE VANDERFORD
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES IRS and INMATE TRUST FUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AZCONA v. CAMDEN COUNTY DRUG COURT, et al
as 1:2024cv05644
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
Camden County Drug Court, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arcona v. Camden County Drug Court et al
as 1:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arcona and Daniel Azcona
Defendant:
Camden County Druo Court, New Brunswick Police Dept., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. RMHS et al
as 1:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Cal Bartis and Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
RMHS, Amsterclam Social Services, DHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Harry Davis
Defendant:
Joe Biden and The IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 6:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Orlando Rosa Rodriguez
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals, DEA, Swat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
