Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge
as 23-358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Gillespie Wadsworth, Counselor Mrs. Wiggins, Warden J. C. Holland, Individually and in their official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Shellard, Deputy Hoyt, Deputy Bitterman and others
Arnett Thomas v. Robin Jackson
as 22-7153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARNETT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBIN JACKSON, J. C. HOLLAND, WARDEN SCARANTINO and others
Arnett Thomas v. J.C. Holland
as 22-7139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARNETT THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND, T. SCARANTINO and ROBIN JACKSON
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 5:2020ct03064
Defendant:
Patterson, Judge Charles J. Siragusa, M.C.J. Lt. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Warden J. C. Holland, Dr. Gillespie Wadsworth and Counselor Mrs. Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez-Martinez v. USA et al
as 5:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Miguel Marquez-Martinez
Defendant:
USA, Calvin Terrance Davis, Lt. Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquez-Martinez v. USA et al
as 5:2018ct03118
Plaintiff:
Miguel Marquez-Martinez
Defendant:
USA, Calvin Terrance Davis, Lt. Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Jeff Sessions
as 18-6421
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, J. C. HOLLAND, Warden and BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER
Chad S. Williams v. J. Holland
as 18-6153
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHAD S. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND
Marco Strickland v. J.C. Holland
as 18-6047
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCO STRICKLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND, Warden
Duane Letroy Berry v. J. C. Holland
as 17-7348
Petitioner - Appellant:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND, Warden and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
