Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mills v. Beitzel et al
as 1:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Lauren A. Beitzel, April Carr, Vaughn Whiteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Lauren Beitzel et al
as 1:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Lauren Beitzel, Vaughn Whiteman, Lieutenant, John G. Sindy, Case Management Specialist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Runion et al
as 4:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Jackie Runion, Warden Jeffie Walker, Captain G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Runion et al
as 4:2021cv04056
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Runion, Warden Walker, Lieutenant Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hash v. Giacomazzi et al
as 5:2020cv01116
Defendant:
S. Lucas, C. Remillard, R. Persaud and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basham v. Harrison et al
as 4:2019cv04099
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Corporal D. Rogers, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Destre Basham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Runion et al
as 4:2018cv04116
Plaintiff:
Cody S. Howard
Defendant:
Sheriff Jackie Runion, Sergeant J. Guthrie, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala v. Grant et al
as 5:2015cv03037
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Medrano Ayala
Defendant:
John Grant , E. Tootell , N. Podolsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Moore v. A. Bulatao, et al
as 14-16867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
A. BULATAO, D. SMETHERS, J. GUTHRIE, Sgt. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
