Cases 1 - 10 of 52
J.V. v. Aykroyd Lake et al
as 7:2023cv03419
Defendant:
GOSHEN SECURE CENTER UNKNOWN SUPERVISORY STAFF MEMBERS in their respective individual capacities, GOSHEN SECURE CENTER OFFICER VERONICA HAYES, in her individual capacity, GOSHEN SECURE CENTER OFFICER CHRISTOPHER CARDINAL, in his individual capacity and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES LAKE in his individual capacity
Plaintiff:
J. V.
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bracy v. Tully, et al
as 1:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Bracy
Defendant:
J. V. Tully, Gregory McRae and SSGT Dallack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochester v. Bryant et al
as 6:2021cv01880
Defendant:
K Bryant, B Stirling, Food Services Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McManus v. Yang et al
as 1:2017cv00892
Plaintiff:
Danny McManus
Defendant:
V. Yang, J. D. Fugate, J. V. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00076
Petitioner:
Craig Douglas Cooper
Respondent:
J. V. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Golden v. Flournoy
as 2:2017cv00075
Petitioner:
Rodney Demetrius Golden
Respondent:
J. V. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wells v. Flourney
as 2:2017cv00065
Petitioner:
Tony Wells
Respondent:
J. V. Flourney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. Flournay
as 2:2017cv00035
Petitioner:
Ricky Mitchell
Respondent:
J. V. Flournay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Flournoy
as 2:2017cv00025
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Williams
Respondent:
J. V. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles Llewlyn v. J. Flournoy
as 17-10671
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES LLEWLYN, a.k.a. Owen Oddman
Respondent - Appellee:
J. V. FLOURNOY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.