Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ware v. Thibault
as 1:2020cv10016
Petitioner:
James Ware and Herdius Evans
Respondent:
Suzanne Thibault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Mabie v. Chief Deputy Clerk, et al
as 14-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William J. Mabie
Defendant - Appellee:
Chief Deputy Clerk, John James Ware, Dean John Sauer and others
William Mabie v. Chief Deputy Clerk, et al
as 14-1188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William J. Mabie
Defendant - Appellee:
Chief Deputy Clerk, John James Ware, Dean John Sauer and others
Mabie v. Chief Deputy Clerk et al
as 4:2013cv02469
Plaintiff:
William J. Mabie
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Clerk, John James Ware, Dean John Sauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ware v. Pepe
as 1:2010cv12216
Petitioner:
James Ware
Respondent:
Peter Pepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bermudez v. Ware et al
as 5:2010cv05270
Plaintiff:
Nicole Denise Bermudez
Defendant:
James Ware, Howard R. Lloyd, Patricia V. Trumbull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ware v. O'Brien
as 09-1851
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WARE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN J. O'BRIEN, Superintendent, Old Colony Correctional Center
Stote, et al v. Maloney, et al
as 08-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE, FRANCIS HANNON, SEAN MILLIKEN and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE M. MCARTHUR, WAYNE D. CROSBY, STEVEN BALSAVICH and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. MALONEY, PETER ALLEN, GARY FYFE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GERI CRISMAN, GURVINDER KAUR JAISWAL and U MASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH UNIT
Josselyn, et al v. Dennehy, et al
as 08-1095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRINCE MOSES, DAVID A. JOSSELYN, GARY EMERSON and others
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN KING
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. TYREE and TYRAN DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DENNEHY and JAMES R. BENDER
Boccio, et al v. Dennehy, et al
as 08-1096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS R. BOCCIO
Plaintiff:
PRINCE MOSES, KEVIN KING, GARY EMERSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DENNEHY and JAMES R. BENDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
