Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Henderson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv02577
Respondent:
Amy Weirich, State of Tennessee and Sheriff Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jerry Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ernst et al v Salmonson
as 6:2018cv00046
Petitioner:
Leslie Ernst, Jerry Henderson, Jason Fraker and others
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Salmonson
as 2:2018cv00024
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Petitioner:
Jerry Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dionell Payne v. Richard Maher, et al
as 15-2779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIONELL PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MAHER, Sergeant, Chicago Police (Star #1478), MIGUEL BAUTISTA, Officer, (Star #5521), PETER MEDINA, Officer (Star #13823) and others
Dionell Payne v. Richard Maher, et al
as 15-2779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIONELL PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD MAHER, Sergeant, Chicago Police (Star #1478), MIGUEL BAUTISTA, Officer, (Star #5521), PETER MEDINA, Officer (Star #13823) and others
Henderson v. USA
as 3:2011cv01313
Petitioner:
Jerry Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ruston v. Church Of Jesus Christ Of, et al
as 08-4101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, GORDON B. HINCKLEY, VICTOR JAMES RUSTON and others
Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2007cv00929
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Gordon B. Hinckley, Victor James Ruston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2006cv00526
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Gordon B. Hinckley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
