Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ratliff v. Piercy et al
as 6:2022cv03286
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ratliff
Defendant:
Jacob Piercy, Darryn Schertz, James (Jimmy) Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramsey v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2018cv01101
Petitioner:
James E. Ramsey
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramsey v. Blades
as 1:2016cv00533
Petitioner:
James Butler Ramsey
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01810
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAMSEY v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2012cv01910
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD RAMSEY
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. , THOMAS N. FAUST and US PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMSEY v. FAUST et al
as 1:2012cv01818
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD RAMSEY
Respondent:
THOMAS N. FAUST and EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James Ramsey v. Randy Blade
as 09-35071
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES B. RAMSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Warden of ISCI
King v. McClain et al
as 5:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Vernard King
Defendant:
Micheal J McClain, James G Ramsey, Fred C Early and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garza v. Rodriguez, et al
as 08-10333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUADALUPE GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
DELBERT R RODRIGUEZ, Preston E Smith Unit, FRED C EARLY, Preston E Smith Unit, JAMES C RAMSEY, Preston E Smith Unit and others
Garza v. Rodriguez, et al
as 08-10319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUADALUPE GARZA
Defendant - Appellee:
DELBERT R RODRIGUEZ, Preston E Smith Unit, FRED C EARLY, Preston E Smith Unit, JAMES C RAMSEY, Preston E Smith Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
