Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Finch v. State Bar of Texas
as 22-10370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Drake Jordan Finch
Defendant / Appellee:
State Bar of Texas, I. Ibarra, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Board of Disciplinary Appeals and others
Finch v. State Bar of Texas et al
as 2:2019cv00053
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch and Drake Jordan Finch
Defendant:
Christine McKeeman, James English, I Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. The State of Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00220
Defendant:
Northwest Texas Hospital, Attorney General of Texas (Office), Micheal Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch and Drake Jordan Finch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. Governor of the State of Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Drake Finch
Defendant:
Governor of the State of Texas, Lt. Governor State of Texas, Deputy Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Doctor et al
as 3:2015cv02084
Plaintiff:
James English, Jr
Defendant:
Unnamed Female Doctor, Captain King and Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Dallas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2015cv02010
Plaintiff:
James English, Jr
Defendant:
Dallas County Sheriff's Department, Doctor, Female Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fred English v. USA
as 12-1426
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRED JAMES ENGLISH
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Broadhead v. English et al
as 1:2010cv00662
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
James English, Michael Watson and Ashworth Penton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addo v. Chadbourne et al
as 1:2008cv10667
Plaintiff:
Ali H. Addo
Defendant:
Bruce Chadbourne, James English and Jennifer McGrath
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodwin v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2007cv01364
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of, Mitchell Sperry and James English
Petitioner:
Kenneth Gene Goodwin, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
