Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BERRY v. BROTHERS et al
as 1:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
TRAVIS JOHN BERRY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00959
Petitioner:
JOHN BERRY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibukun Washington v. Michael Mackey, et al
as 18-10039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IBUKUN OLOWA WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL R. MACKEY, Warden, JOHN BERRY, Chaplain, C. M. MADYUN, Chaplain and others
BERRY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00169
Petitioner:
JOHN BERRY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orlando Campos v. Beeville Police Department, et al
as 16-41291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO CAMPOS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRIS BERNAL, JOHN BERRY and others
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC. et al v. THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH
as 5:2016cv04504
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC. , STEPHEN MEHOLIC , DAVID SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Mackey et al
as 3:2016cv01374
Plaintiff:
Ibukun Olowa Washington
Defendant:
Michael R Mackey, John Berry and C.M. Madyun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orlando Campos v. Beeville Police Department, et al
as 15-41038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO CAMPOS
Defendant - Appellee:
BEEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRIS BERNAL, JOHN BERRY and others
Campos et al v. Beeville Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Orlando Campos
Defendant:
Beeville Police Department, Chris Bernal, John Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campos v. Beeville Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
Abraham Campos
Defendant:
Beeville Police Department, Chris Bernal, John Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
