Cases 1 - 10 of 54
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brent Jacoby v. John Hamm, et al
as 24-10574
Plaintiff:
BRENT JACOBY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN Q. HAMM, EASTERLING CF WARDEN and others
Lynch v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
McArthur Lynch, Jr
Defendant:
Hon. Steve Marshall, John Q. Hamm, Warden Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
David P. Wilson
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holifield v. Hamm et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamar Holifield
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rives v. Hamm et al
as 4:2023cv01659
Petitioner:
Walter Richard Rives
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm, Phillip Mitchell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections Commissioner, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Petitioner:
Arnaldo Mercado, Dustin Brewer and Steven Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Hamm et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Dominiqic I. Curry
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Sheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
