Cases 1 - 10 of 14
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 22-6785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DYE, R. BISHOP, S. YOUNG and others
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. Collins et al
as 7:2020cv00742
Defendant:
S. Fletcher, Lavonda Deel, C/O A. Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00558
Defendant:
AW Anderson, Prison Guard Cox, AW Combs and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Ulm Collins, Hawkins, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 2:2018cv00616
Defendant:
R. Walz, U/M Duncan, W. Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Kiser et al
as 7:2018cv00556
Defendant:
D. Tate, M. L. Counts, Glen Conrad and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Kiser et al
as 7:2018cv00485
Defendant:
R. Ballou, Glen Conrad, C. Stanley and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Counts et al
as 7:2018cv00502
Defendant:
M.L. Counts, Kieth Dawkins, J. Fannin and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Gordon v. Rena Mullin
as 14-6497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL D. GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
RENA I. MULLINS, Institutional Ombudsman, FONNIE TAYLOR, Institutional Ombudsman, SHERRY SHORTRIDGE, Institutional Operations Officer/Manager and others
Defendant:
W. P. ROGERS, Assistant Deputy Director of Operations of the VDOC, JOHN JABE, JOHN S. GARMAN, Regional Director for the Western Region of the VDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
