Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00884
Petitioner:
Kendrick Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Suggs v. Cotter et al
as 3:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Cordell Suggs
Defendant:
Kenneth P Cotter, Sherece M Love and Lisa Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOUDREAUX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
KENDRICK SHANE BOUDREAUX
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kendrick v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2022cv00673
Defendant:
Lorre Idown, Nancy Marthakis, Centurion Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kendrick
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. USA
as 2:2022cv00074
Petitioner:
Rickey Cortez Kendrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HAYES v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Defendant:
MATLOCK, T. TURNER, M. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTERO HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENDRICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv02101
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MIKEL KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KENDRICK v. CAPPA et al
as 1:2019cv02672
Defendant:
JEFF CAPPA, JASON WYSONG, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MARK E. KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENDRICK v. LIMBURG et al
as 1:2019cv02229
Defendant:
JEFF CAPPA, JOHN DOE, DAVE LIMBURG and others
Plaintiff:
MARK E. KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENDRICK et al v. ABNEY-BROTZ et al
as 1:2017cv03760
Defendant:
ANDREW ABNEY-BROTZ, JEFF CAPPA and CHRIS TOBY
Plaintiff:
JAMES M HARTSFIELD and MARK E. KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
