Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Lenz v. Cullman County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
William Dallas Lenz
Defendant:
Cullman County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iverson v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00631
Defendant:
Scott Reynolds, Patino Press, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Iverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lenz
Defendant:
Warden Deshawn Jones, Deputy Warden Polite and Lt Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy Kerr v. Keith Lenz, et al
as 23-3479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY LYNN KERR
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH LENZ, EDWARD LEE SCHIMMEL, HIZER & SCHIMMEL and others
Gose v. Lenz et al
as 2:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Gose
Defendant:
Troy Lenz, Gregory Stompner, Destiny Krebs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenze v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
Andrew Myles Lenze
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lenz v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01359
Plaintiff:
Jason Lenz
Defendant:
Anette Chambers-Smith, Michael Anderson and Warden Jennifer Gillece-Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. Lenz et al
as 3:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kerr
Defendant:
Keith Lenz, Edward L Schimmel, Hizer & Schimmel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Thomas v. Lenz et al
as 1:2021cv02519
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Analaura Lenz, Connie Price, Jacob Wolford and others
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER/INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Kenneth Michael Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenze v. Gilley
as 6:2021cv00115
Petitioner:
Andrew Myles Lenze
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
