Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Saunders v. Harrington
as 22-340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Saunders
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Gonzalez, Esq., William M. Harrington, Tamara Marshall and others
Saunders v. Harrington et al
as 1:2021cv06038
Plaintiff:
Marcus Saunders
Defendant:
William M. Harrington, Eric Gonzalez, Tamara Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. Ma'at et al
as 2:2021cv03713
Plaintiff:
Victor C Vargas
Defendant:
S Ma'at, R Doyle, J Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Mr. S. Ma'at, et al et al
as 5:2021cv00014
Respondent:
Ms.R Doyle, Mr. S. Ma'at, et al, Mr. T Charter and others
Petitioner:
Victor C Vargas
Defendant:
Udelhoven Oilfield System Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker #132271 v. Harrington
as 1:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
L T Tucker #132271
Defendant:
Kaleb M. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. New York State Supreme Court f
as 17-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Reaves
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Supreme Court for the Second Judicial District, Sylvia G. Ash, Bruce M. Balter and others
Reaves v. Supreme Court State of New York, Second Judicial District et al
as 1:2017cv01693
Defendant:
Sheila Abdus-Salam, Rachel Amy Adams, Sylvia G. Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander-Mathias v. Officer Shield #0128 et al
as 1:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Sonia Alexander-Mathias
Defendant:
Officer Shield #0128 and Jeffery M. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Harrington v. Secretary, FL DOC
as 13-12571
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY M. HARRINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
King v. Boyle et al
as 7:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
Martin D King
Defendant:
NFN Boyle, NFN Cozby and M Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
