Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ford v. USA
as 1:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Ford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ford v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2022cv00927
Petitioner:
Michael A. Ford
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Federal Law Enforcement et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Michael Ford and Michael Jamal Ford
Defendant:
Federal Law Enforcement, Jason Geist and Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Alabama Deparment of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Defendant:
Alabama Deparment of Corrections, Kay Ivey, Bibb County Corrections Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. BOROUGH OF WEST CHESTER et al
as 2:2021cv03421
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL G FORD
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WEST CHESTER, CHRISTOPHER CRAIG, AARON DIEFENDERFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Fountain Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00183
Defendant:
Fountain Facility, Mary Cooks and Anthony Smiley
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Thomas et al
as 7:2021cv00464
Defendant:
Gretchen Rooker, John Hutton and Jimmy Thomas
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Bibb County Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2021cv00455
Defendant:
Warden and Bibb County Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Fountain Facility et al
as 2:2021cv00254
Defendant:
Fountain Facility, Mary Cooks and Anthony Smiley
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Peterson et al
as 2:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Peterson and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Michael Kardell Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
