Cases 1 - 10 of 38
TOWNSEND v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Defendant:
A. MOSELEY, D. BEDWELL, JAMES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kittrell v. Gates et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ulyessie Kittrell
Defendant:
Eric Gates, Jason Kormanic, Shawn McGlaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Schoenbeck et al
as 3:2022cv02146
Plaintiff:
Shawn Randall
Defendant:
Joshua Schoenbeck, Anthony Jones, Angie Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stidfole v. Armel et al
as 1:2022cv00381
Petitioner:
Adam M. Stidfole
Respondent:
Eric Armel, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Mifflin County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colyer v. County of Mifflin et al
as 3:2021cv01117
Defendant:
Kurtz, Unknown Medical Providers John Does 1-10, Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas T. Colyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colyer v. County of Mifflin et al
as 2:2021cv02739
Defendant:
CO Angela Jones, CO Kurtz, Unknown Correctional Officers John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas T. Colyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Effler et al
as 2:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Marney E Gilliam, Todd Burnette, Jerry Mifflin and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00234
Defendant:
ANDREA MASON, RICHARD BROWN, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
STEVE L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2020cv01158
Defendant:
ANDREA MASON, RICHARD BROWN, A. RITTENBERG and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNDEN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Defendant:
RANDALL PURCELL, RUSSELL, ANDREA STROUP and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH MUNDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
