Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Woodson v. Custer et al
as 7:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Custer, Ms. Lt. Saville, Mr. Lt. Derito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEHLER v. BARBEAU et al
as 2:2019cv02957
Defendant:
MR. TIMOTHY FRITZ, MR. MARCEL BARBEAU and MR. RYAN LONG
Plaintiff:
MR. WESLEY BEHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez v. O'Neil et al
as 5:2017ct03182
Plaintiff:
Eli Alvarez
Defendant:
Mr. O'Neil, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Garitty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv05511
Plaintiff:
Ned James
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Thomas Dart, Daniel Moreci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciccone v. Ryan
as 1:2014cv01325
Plaintiff:
Nicholas V. Ciccone
Defendant:
Mrs. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciccone v. Ryan
as 9:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Nicholas V. Ciccone
Defendant:
Mrs. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv02974
Plaintiff:
David Moreno
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Ronnie Holt, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Williams v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2013cv01853
Plaintiff:
Ramel Williams
Defendant:
United States Of America , Ronnie Holt, B. Sullivan and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Randolph v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv01789
Plaintiff:
Dexter Randolph
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Ronnie Holt, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Prosise v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv01767
Plaintiff:
Ray Prosise
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Ronnie Holt, B. Sullivan and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
