Cases 1 - 10 of 2,970
Chargois-El v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2024cv01263
Defendant:
Marcus Myers and James M LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Kendell Joseph Chargois-El and Kendell Chargois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chargois-El v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2024cv01264
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Marcus Myers and James M LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Kendell Joseph Chargois-El and Kendell Chargois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv06166
Defendant:
Dart, Myers, McCray and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gautier v. Myers
as 8:2024cv00363
Respondent:
Mike Myers
Petitioner:
David Gautier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pinner v. Peters et al
as 3:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
Melodie Pinner
Defendant:
Tony Kline, Heide Stewart, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffee v. Wexford Healthcare et al
as 3:2024cv01705
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Coffee
Defendant:
Dr. Myers, Mrs. Desai and Nurse Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Munoz-Perez v. Myers
as 3:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Martin Munoz-Perez
Defendant:
Dr Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Barwick et al
as 3:2024cv02125
Defendant:
Bob Plum, John Barwick, Christine Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Darbonne v. Dupuy et al
as 1:2024cv00958
Defendant:
James Longino, Donovan Dupuy, Major Veade and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Darbonne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wudnuer v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 8:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Wubill Wudnuer and Kan Mar
Defendant:
Douglas County Department of Corrections, Hawshank, CO's and Seargants Involved and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
