Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alexander v. Strong
as 4:2017cv02390
Plaintiff:
Sidric Mark Alexander
Defendant:
Kelly L Strong, Lorie Davis, Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sidric Alexander v. Dale Wainwright, et al
as 17-20398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDRIC MARK ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
DALE WAINWRIGHT, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and K. STRONG, Warden, John Wynn Unit
Alexander v. Wainwright et al
as 4:2017cv01152
Plaintiff:
Sidric Mark Alexander
Defendant:
Dale Wainwright and K Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Wainwright et al
as 3:2017cv00946
Petitioner:
Sidric Mark Alexander
Respondent:
Dale Wainwright and K Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cedric Alexander v. Barcardi and Company, et al
as 16-11717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC MARK ALEXANDER, On behalf of self and all others similarly situated, also known as Sidric Mark Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
BARCARDI AND COMPANY, MCCORMICK DISTILLING COMPANY, DIAGEO BEVERAGE and others
Alexander v. Barcardi and Company et al
as 3:2016cv00903
Plaintiff:
Cedric Mark Alexander
Defendant:
Barcardi and Company, McCormick Distilling Co, Diageo Beverage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Mark Alexander and Becky Feldman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Alexander et al
as 1:2014cv03542
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Mark Alexander, Sr., Ashley McKenzie, Becky Feldman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Feldman et al
as 1:2014cv03142
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Becky Feldman and Mark Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Burk et al
as 2:2013cv00324
Plaintiff:
Mark Alexander Scott
Defendant:
Geneva Burk, Hewson and Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
