Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Stompingbear v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, John Rodgers, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stompingbear v. Kelley et al
as 4:2018cv00827
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stompingbear v. Reed
as 6:2018cv06105
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Ferrell et al
as 5:2017cv00122
Defendant:
C Ferrell, Lowe, James Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Damien Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyde v. Evans et al
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Charles Hyde
Defendant:
Marvin Evans, Michael Morries, Timothy L Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamner v. Burls et al
as 5:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Charles E Hamner
Defendant:
Danny Burls, Connie Jenkins, Maurice Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Cantrell v. Arkansas Dept. of Correct, et al
as 16-4100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Asa Hutchinson, Governor, State of Arkansas, City of Little Rock and others
Ward v. Kelley et al
as 5:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Asa Hutchinson, Steven Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Asa Hutchinson, Little Rock, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
