Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Bryant v. West Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Bryant
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Corrections, Super. Mr. Thompson, Maj. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Light v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Colton Light
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, South Central Regional Jail, Christopher Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Mason Bishop
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Winters et al
as 2:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott, Sr. and Michael A Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Zachary Winters, Adam Mason and The City of Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eskridge et al v. West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Billy Mason Eskridge, Bryant Carr and Charles Lane
Defendant:
West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Youmans v. Wolfe
as 1:2021cv00113
Petitioner:
Macie Mason Youmans
Respondent:
R. M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mason v. Santiago et al
as 2:2020cv00693
Defendant:
Captain Brian Penick, Correctional Officer Skylar Santiago, Correctional Officer Johnnie Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mason v. Warden
as 1:2020cv00433
Petitioner:
Keith Mason
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mason v. Hudgiens
as 3:2020cv00026
Petitioner:
Keith Mason
Respondent:
Warden Hudgiens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mason v. Hudgiens
as 3:2020cv00015
Petitioner:
Keith Mason
Respondent:
Warden Hudgiens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
