Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Murphy v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
STRAFFORD COUNTY HOUSE OF CORRECTION, LEONARD NADEAU, Sergeant, DONNA ROY, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM L. WRENN, MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden and others
Lohnes v. Sue et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
James A Lohnes and James Andrew Lohnes
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Sue, Nurse Practitioner Willie, Correctional Health Indiana, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lohnes v. Martinez et al
as 2:2019cv00486
Respondent:
Oscar Martinez, Jr, O'Connor, Michael A Zenk and others
Petitioner:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lohnes v. Martinez, Jr et al
as 2:2019cv00286
Defendant:
Ryan Neary, Michael A Zenk, Joe Menchaca and others
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towle v. Zenk
as 17-1251
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT V. TOWLE
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden, NH State Prison
Camacho v. Zenk
as 1:2016cv11826
Petitioner:
Jesse Camacho
Defendant:
Michael A. Zenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sandy Baez v. Cornell Co Inc, et al
as 11-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDY BAEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNELL CO INC, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER CORNELL CO INC, FED BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Sandy Baez v. Cornell Co Inc, et al
as 11-1347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDY BAEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNELL CO INC, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER CORNELL CO INC, FED BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Miguelo Morales v. Michael Zenk, et al
as 10-4204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUELO MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden of MVCC, FBOP and CORNELL CO INC
Paul Alba, Jr. v. Michael Zenk, et al
as 10-13370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL ALBA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, M. BRANCH, D. ACRES and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
