Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Walker v. Anders et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
N.W. Anders, C. Pittsinger, Ms. Sheffield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. The City of New York
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Walker v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI
Gomez v. City of Canton Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01788
Plaintiff:
Omar R. Gomez
Defendant:
City of Canton Police Department, Detective Michael Walker, Ohio Adult Parole Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Michael Walker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Lynn
as 23-395
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Walker
Respondent / Appellee:
Lilly J. Lynn
Michael Walker v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 22-2693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Walker v. Baldauf
as 3:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
P.A. Fawn Lynn Baldauf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Walker, et al v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WALKER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAURICE PEARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections
Folsom v. Walker, et al
as 22-6009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN FOLSOM
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL WALKER, LINDSAY MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL, NORTH FORK CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
