Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Le v. Mims et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Le
Defendant:
Beth Mims, City of Jemison and Rickey Patrick Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Mims-Harris et al
as 2:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Morris and Calvin Morris
Defendant:
Lieutenant Mims-Harris, Officer Emerson, Lt. Mims-Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mims v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
David Mims
Defendant:
James Glenn Goggans, Tracy Jackson, Captain Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dwight R. Coleman, Robert Earl Jackson Little, Jason Daniels and others
Defendant:
Larry Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00679
Plaintiff:
Kevon Darrell Mims
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00254
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Corizon, LLC (INMATE 1)(CONSENT)
as 7:2019cv02065
Defendant:
Officer Melton, Leon Bolling, Cardaro Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Melton et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, John Hutton and Cordaro Melton
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. The United States et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00499
Defendant:
The United States, Alabama Law Enforcement Agency and The Congress of the United States
Plaintiff:
Hasalee Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
