Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Coleman, Sidney v. Poi, Elizabeth et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Defendant:
John Doe 3, Rock County, Dr. Agnieszka Rogalska and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lee Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krick v. Town of Lyons et al
as 6:2024cv06178
Plaintiff:
Mr. Joshua Krick and Joshua Krick
Defendant:
Town of Lyons, Mr. Michael Bouwens, Marc Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grefer v. Renavldo et al
as 6:2023cv06005
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Grefer
Defendant:
Joseph Renavldo and Rochester Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gist-Holden et al v. Goote et al
as 1:2021cv04169
Plaintiff:
Hailey Gist-Holden, Briana White and Johnnie Holden
Defendant:
Christopher Goote, Bryan, Kevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. SAFEGUARD STORAGE PROPERTIES, LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv01844
Plaintiff:
DAVID BALLARD
Defendant:
SAFEGUARD STORAGE PROPERTIES, LLC., SHANEEN ALLEN and ANTHONY TULLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. MAAT Properties LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02454
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Adams
Defendant:
MAAT Properties LLC and Betty Sung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGESS v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.
Defendant:
EBAY, INC., PAYPAL, INC., GOOGLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-17134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-17089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
