Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Nelson v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01284
Defendant:
Tasheena Sandoval-Cooke, S. Ciciliano, Nevada Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Nelson
Defendant:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections, T. Cooke, Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Filson et al
as 3:2021cv00202
Defendant:
Quentin Byrne, Timothy Filson, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Nelson et al
as 5:2020cv01282
Defendant:
M Hannah, Bossier Parish Sheriff, Scott Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheldon v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00898
Defendant:
Marshall Herring, Willis, Columbia Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Bradford A. Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2019cv02397
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
ARNOLD P. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOSE v. JONES et al
as 3:2018cv00493
Plaintiff:
LOVENSON ALLEN MOSE
Defendant:
J JONES, J DEMONTMOLLIN and P NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michel v. Chapa et al
as 1:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adelson Michel
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa, Radick Davis, Kim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Travis v. Syed, Salam et al
as 3:2016cv00474
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Williams
Defendant:
Salam Syed , Scott Hoftiezer, Vickrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. League Medical Concepts et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Richardson
Defendant:
League Medical Concepts, FNU Polaurapu, FNU Bryd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
