Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Jones v. Redbird Medical
as 6:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Redbird Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Brian Paul Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JONES v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and DIVISION OF LABORATORIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Turnkey Medical Services
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Sheriff's Department and Turnkey Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. I.R.S.
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant:
I.R.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Corrections Officer Hill and HDSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Jones v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jones v. Taylor County Detention Center
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
George-Paul Jones
Defendant:
Taylor County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Abilene Police Department
as 1:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
George-Paul Jones
Defendant:
Abilene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2023cv00379
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, SCI SOMERSET and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
