Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Muniz v. Bank of America et al
as 4:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
Mario Muniz
Defendant:
Bank of America, PLS Check Cashing and Stephen Bekale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. City of Houston HPD et al
as 4:2021cv00619
Defendant:
ADA Complaint Claim #(20-0cr-0873), City of Houston HPD, PLS Check Cashing Store and others
Plaintiff:
Kolan Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Annucci
as 18-1807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr. Acting Commissioner; DOCCS, Maureen Boll, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel; DOCCS, Jeff McKoy, Deputy Commissioner of Programs; DOCCS and others
Jenkins v. PLS Check Cashing
as 4:2018cv01449
Plaintiff:
Kolan Jenkins
Defendant:
PLS Check Cashing and City of Houston HPD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sankara v. Citibank et al
as 1:2017cv10020
Plaintiff:
Ahmadou Sankara
Defendant:
Citibank, T.D. Bank, PLS Financial Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elwell v. Fisher
as 0:2011cv02595
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Elwell
Respondent:
Scott Pl Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Nassau County Jail et al
as 2:2011cv04242
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Services, McMumman, Mr According and others
Plaintiff:
O'Keith Lewis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Loftus et al
as 1:2011cv21066
Plaintiff:
Gus Lanier
Defendant:
James K. Loftus, Oscar Jimenez, Jermaine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. et al v. CHESTER COUNTY CT. COMM. PL'S et al
as 2:2010cv06859
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER IWANICKI
Respondent:
CHESTER COUNTY CT. COMM. PL'S and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
