Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Jordan v. Barves et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
J. Barves, J. Pumphrey, Lt. Bardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pumphrey v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01800
Petitioner:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pumphrey v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01801
Petitioner:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pumphrey v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Defendant:
Judge Courtney Johnson, District Attorney Joseph Lenoff and Attorney Ingrid McGaughey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pumphrey v. DeBerry
as 1:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Defendant:
Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pumphrey v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Alexando Pumphrey
Respondent:
Judge Courtney Johnson, District Attorney Joseph Lenoff and Attorney Ingrid McGaughey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pumphrey v. Deberry
as 1:2022cv05061
Plaintiff:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Defendant:
Debra Deberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pumphrey v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Defendant:
Judge Courtney Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pumphrey v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Elton Leroy Pumphrey
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vance v. Butler et al
as 4:2021cv04059
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Vance
Defendant:
Gina Butler, Bobby Walraven, Tracey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
