Cases 1 - 10 of 1,186
Medina v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
Nestor Medina
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc., Felicia Adkins, Dr J Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Tlusty v. D. Swain, et al
as 24-11921
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. TLUSTY
Defendant:
D. SWAIN, Correctional Officer, K. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, J. ELLENBURG, Correctional Officer and others
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 3:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Malcom Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
Office of George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tuten v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Terry Burdette Tuten
Defendant:
Warden, Salyard, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 7:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Malcom Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor:
Kendra Feltner
Defendant:
Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Pittman et al
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Pittman, White and Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Pickett, et al
as 24-1153
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PICKETT, C/O, FONTEROT, C/O, PLATO, C/O and others
Pittman v. Fulton County Police Department
as 1:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Fulton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
