Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Johnson v. 195 Mill Steet Market et al
as 1:2024cv01879
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Johnson
Defendant:
195 Mill Steet Market, Employee Jacob, R&S Market and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Don Galloway v. Donnie Ames
as 23-7046
Petitioner / Appellant:
DON GARFIELD GALLOWAY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and R. S. MUTTER, Superintendent
Holloway v. R. S. W. Regional Jail et al
as 7:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Chris Eugene Holloway
Defendant:
R. S. W. Regional Jail, Sgt. Miller, CO. Preacher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sellers v. Dunbar
as 5:2023cv02237
Petitioner:
Fredrick L Sellers
Respondent:
R S Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sloan v. R. S. Dunbar, Warden
as 9:2023cv01782
Petitioner:
Dameion Sloan
Respondent:
R. S. Dunbar, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stump et al v. Marshall et al
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jedadiah Stump and Adonnis Shephard
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, III, R. S. Mutter, Curtis Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeland v. Mutter
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Aron Freeland
Respondent:
R. S. Mutter and Brad Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Freeland v. Mutter
as 1:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Aron J. Freeland
Respondent:
Scott Patterson and R. S. Mutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McPherson v. Mutter
as 1:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Wayne McPherson
Respondent:
Brad Douglas and R. S. Mutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Freeland v. Mutter
as 1:2022cv00581
Petitioner:
Aron Freeland
Respondent:
R. S. Mutter and Brad Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
