Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Anderson v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Terrance R. Anderson
Defendant:
State of New York, City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duvivier v. Knight et al
as 3:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Duvivier
Defendant:
Kyle Knight, J. Birdsong, Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. HARVEY et al
as 2:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
DAIMIA R. ANDERSON
Defendant:
HARVEY, JULIE STOUT and ROBIN GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnathan Harper v. David Robinson, et al
as 22-16450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, DAVID PUTNAM, CRYSTAL THOMAS and others
Taylor v. Ramirez et al
as 7:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mickey R. Taylor
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Ramirez, Deputy B. R. Anderson, Deputy J. Stotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Mickey R. Taylor
Defendant:
Deputy Steven Ramirez, Deputy B. R. Anderson, Deputy J. Stotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Robinson, et al.
as 1:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Seth Harper
Defendant:
David Robinson, David Putnam, Crystal Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Chavez v. Gomez et al
as 1:2020cv01684
Defendant:
A. Gomez, R. Anderson, M. Putnam and others
Plaintiff:
Moises Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv02300
Defendant:
Jaimie Belcher, Antonio Brown, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Anderson and Matthew R Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
D'ANGELO LAVELLE DIXON
Defendant:
JAMES J GOODMAN, JR and TAYLOR R ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
