Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bless, Alfredo v. Acosta et al
as 1:2024cv21343
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless and Alfredo - a- Bless
Defendant:
F. Acosta, A. Horner, Doctor R. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. R. Cruz et al
as 4:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Muhammad
Defendant:
R. Cruz, Mr. Carvlani and Mr. Rembarse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Walker et al
as 3:2023cv01387
Petitioner:
James R. Cruz
Respondent:
Superintendent Tina Walker and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferson v. Edouard et al
as 8:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jefferson
Defendant:
Doctor Edoverd, Anthony R. Cruz and Doctor Edouard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Fersinda et al
as 9:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes and Misso Holmes
Defendant:
Fersinda, D. Carbanero, R. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Banks v. The BOP Paralegal Specialists & DSCC et al
as 2:2020cv11817
Respondent:
Leeann D Tufte, Alicia Sankey, The BOP Paralegal Specialists & DSCC and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roundtree Jr v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Rivera, John Doe, Cortez and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Lashawn Roundtree Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stringer v. Cruz et al
as 3:2019cv02624
Defendant:
R. Baxter, Wimc Cullough III, Board of Parol Hearings and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence T. Stringer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv08177
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, T. Bellettiere, R. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinoza v. Campos et al
as 5:2017cv00954
Defendant:
Officer J. Campos, Officer R. Cruz, Sergent FNU Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
John C. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
