Cases 1 - 10 of 306
McClain v. Wells et al
as 3:2024cv01486
Plaintiff:
Justin McClain
Defendant:
Anthony Wells, Joshua Shoenbeck, Charles Rayford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canales v. Rayford et al
as 5:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Canales
Defendant:
Senior Warden Phonso J. Rayford, Correctional Officer Vanessa Valero, Correctional Officer Ruth Trice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00532
Petitioner:
Rayford Glenn Roberson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. MTC et al
as 3:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Ajalon Baker
Respondent:
MTC, TDCJ, FNU Rayford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tipton v. Rayford
as 24-50214
Plaintiff:
Charlton Reed Tipton
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford, Christopher Pauley, Captain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ruth E. Trice, Captain of Correctional Officers and others
Stewart v. Rayford
as 4:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Rayford
as 6:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stewart
Defendant:
Dan Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayford, Jr v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Larry Rayford, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Charles S. Bloodworth, Jaclyn M. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Rayford et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Delvin Brown and Delvon Brown
Defendant:
C/O Rayford, Lt. Dallas, C/O Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Rayford et al
as 9:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
J Rayford, J Hamilton, M McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
