Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Young v. Hagen et al
as 2:2021cv02222
Plaintiff:
Alta Young
Defendant:
Derek Hagen, Iroquois County, Iroquois County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craighead v. Hagen et al
as 2:2021cv02223
Plaintiff:
Jerrie Craighead, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Jason Fancher, deceased and Jerrie Craighead
Defendant:
Derek Hagen, Iroquois County, Jessie Kochenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Martinez
as 1:2019cv01956
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Harris
Defendant:
No Named Defendants and Ray Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Fuller et al
as 6:2013cv03209
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, Mrs Ball, Michael L Fair and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roddey et al v. Fuller et al
as 6:2013cv00884
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Roddey, Bernard McFadden, James Ravenel and others
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, Mrs Ball, Michael L Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Williams v. Shumate et al
as 3:2012cv01257
Plaintiff:
Ken Williams
Defendant:
Mark Shumate, John Doe, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
as 3:2012cv01188
Petitioner:
Ronnie Harris
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2011cv02112
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Ronnie Harris, East Carroll Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Daniels, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. East Carroll Detention Center et al
as 3:2011cv01740
Plaintiff:
Cedric Adams
Defendant:
East Carroll Detention Center, Joseph Poche, Ronnie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. Coleman et al
as 3:2011cv01738
Plaintiff:
Felipe Moreno
Defendant:
Earnestine Coleman, Bailey, Ronnie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
