Cases 1 - 10 of 19
LEISURE II v. PFURSICH et al
as 5:2021cv01769
Defendant:
JACQUELINE PFURSICH and DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS DEBRA RAND
Plaintiff:
JUNIUS P. LEISURE II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENOCH v. PERRY et al
as 1:2019cv00026
Defendant:
SUTTERLANDER, DEPUTY SECRETERY TREVOR WINGARD, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
REV. AUGUSTUS SIMMONS ENOCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SNIDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SNIDER v. WITTIG et al
as 2:2018cv00703
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT WITTIG, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, SHELLY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2016cv01726
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy, John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jack Edwards
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, Becker Bachic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. McCoy et al
as 3:2015cv02174
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Matthew McCoy, Debra Rand, Marcia Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
