Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARRISON v. OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY HARRISON, II
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, EDMOND and MCDANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Harrison v. USA, et al
as 22-15038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD C. HARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A. ASH, USP Medical - Doctor, USP Tucson, DE GUZMAN, First name unknown, USP Medical - Doctor, USP Tucson and others
Harrison v. Ash et al
as 4:2021cv00074
Defendant:
Richard Unger, Unknown De Guzman, A Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Richard C Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRISON v. DESANTEZ
as 3:2020cv05807
Defendant:
RON DESANTEZ, JOHN DOE and FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY HARRISON, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLER et al v. OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2019cv01697
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CORIZON HEALTH, EDMONDS and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN THOMAS, COREY SMITH, BRIAN CASEY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00637
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and Pelicia Hall
Plaintiff:
Richard Kelly Harrison, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison, Richard v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2016cv00124
Petitioner:
Richard H. Harrison, Jr.
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRISON v. OKALOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00464
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY HARRISON, II
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. USA
as 4:2011cv01213
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Richard C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
