Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Robert Gillens v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6227
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director, DOE #1, unknown mail staff/supervisor, KENNETH CRADDOCK, Discipline Hearing Officer and others
STURGIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04409
Defendant:
SERGEANT QADIRAH THOMAS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LIEUTENANT WAYNE LYONS and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS STURGIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robert Gillins v. R. Hudgins
as 22-7352
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLINS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN R. HUDGINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and DIRECTOR MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Bureau of Prisons
Andrew Fields, III v. Patrick Bouldin, et al
as 22-5133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK J. BOULDIN, FRANK W. HEFT, JR., ROBERT BRUCE BONAR and others
Robert Gillins v. R. Hudgins
as 22-6069
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLINS
Receiver:
WARDEN R. HUDGINS
LoRusso v. Canady et al
as 8:2021cv02633
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Defendant:
Charles Canady, Ron Desantis, Bob Gualtieri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillins v. Hudgins
as 5:2021cv00093
Petitioner:
Robert Bruce Gillins
Respondent:
Warden R. Hudgins, Director Michael Carvajal and USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Graves v. Pinellas County Jail et al
as 8:2021cv01202
Defendant:
Robert Bruce and Judge William Burgess
Plaintiff:
Devan Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00448
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Matthew Bender & Company, C.O. Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Washington and Robert Bruce Gillens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LoRusso v. McCabe et al
as 8:2020cv01916
Defendant:
Robert Bruce, Bernie McCabe and Elizabeth Zuroweste
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony LoRusso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
