Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Cimbollek v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2023cv01805
Petitioner:
Robert Murphy Cimbollek
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, County of Union and Director of Union County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Carbajal et al v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv03062
Plaintiff:
Dean Carbajal, Warren Worthington, Estate of Robert Murphy and others
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Jeff Long, Jeff (I) Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Robert Murphy
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barnes v. Fedele
as 22-35
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arrello Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
Fedele, Furman, Correction Officer Robert Murphy and others
Defendant:
M. McGinnis, Napoli, Everette and others
Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01004
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Northwest Regional Reentry Center, Oregon District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. US Marshals Services et al
as 6:2020cv00898
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
US Marshals Services, B.O.P. and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. U.S.A.
as 6:2020cv00872
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pretrial Services et al
as 6:2020cv00780
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
9th Cir. Federal Court and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Kasubhai
as 6:2020cv00781
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
Judge Mustafa Kasubhai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00767
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Springfield Missouri Medical Center Federal Prisoners
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
