Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hill v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv09561
Defendant:
Medicals Does 1-2, The City of New York, C.O. John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Sturgis et al
as 8:2018cv03185
Defendant:
Mark Summerville, Anthony Johnson, Captain Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HILLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv07023
Plaintiff:
RONALD HILLS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Fayette County Circuit Court Criminal Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Fayette County Circuit Court Criminal Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. New York Department of Correction et al
as 1:2012cv02706
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hill
Defendant:
New York Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitmore v. Hill, et al
as 11-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD HILL, Unit Manager/Disciplinary Hearing Officer, MARK BOWEN, Deputy Warden, RALPH FORD, Captain and others
Whitmore v. Hill, et al
as 11-6035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH FORD, DAVID MILLER, Warden and RONALD HILL
Whitmore v. Hill, et al
as 10-6279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD HILL, Unit Mgr/Disciplinary Hearing Officer, PEGGY HAUNG, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, LIEUTENANT JONES, Shift Supervisor and others
Whitmore v. Hill et al
as 5:2010cv00576
Plaintiff:
David Robin Whitmore
Defendant:
Ronald Hill, Mark Bowen, Ralph Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
