Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JONES and SHAMEL JONES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOUNT v. SIBANDA et al
as 2:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
KAREEM BLOUNT
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN SIHANDA, SUPERINTENDENT ZAKEN, SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ENOXH V HICE ET AL
as 2:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
REV. AUGUSTUS SIMMONS ENOXH
Defendant:
M. HICE, COULEHAN, LT. TROUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DEAN v. BUZAS et al
as 2:2021cv00968
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
AL STEVEN BUZAS, KAREN SOKOL, JOSEPH SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SNIDER v. WITTIG et al
as 2:2018cv00703
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT WITTIG, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, SHELLY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Riley v. Kipple et al
as 3:2017cv01526
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Riley
Defendant:
Kipple, Amjad Ali, Aaron Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damien Mikell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 17-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Fomer Superintendent 2, ROBERT GILMORE, Former Superintendent 1, JEFFREY R. ROGERS, Corrections Classifiation adn Program Manager and others
ABD-ALI v. SIBANDA et al
as 2:2016cv01643
Plaintiff:
WALI IBN AL-ISLAM ABD-ALI
Defendant:
SIBANDA, M. DIALESANDRO, K. SOKOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPPELL v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2016cv01317
Plaintiff:
MARK CHAPPELL
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, MARK DIALESANDRO, JUBULANI SIBANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
