Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Matthew Thompson v. B. Smith, et al
as 18-11671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
B. SMITH, Lt, J. SIKES, Capt, D. ATKINS, Co and others
Jonathan McAllister, Sr. v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 17-17469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN MCALLISTER, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, UNKNOWN ALVEREZ, Dr., Director of Arizona County Correctional Health Services, UNKNOWN GRIMM, Lt., Acting Jail Commander and others
James Tate v. Julie Jones, et al
as 16-17601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. TATE
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE JONES, Secretary, WARDEN, T. HESTER, AWO and others
Allah Burman v. R. A. Perdue
as 15-6594
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLAH BURMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN R. A. PERDUE, M. SMITH, Lt. and T. VANERNICK, Lt.
Tafari v. Smith
as 13-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Keven Smith, Lt., R. Murphy, Cpt., David Rock, Supt. and others
Tafari v. Smith
as 13-320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Keven Smith, Lt., R. Murphy, Cpt., David Rock, Supt. and others
Michael Gallagher v. Codfeller
as 12-8015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TYRONE GALLAGHER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY CODFELLER, BRANDON, Deputy, HARPER, Captain and others
Michael Bruno v. Tony Nery
as 10-6946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUNO
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY V. NERY, Officer CO II, BRIAN SMITH, Lt., DAY HOFF, Lt. and others
Orland Briscoe v. Kenneth Klaus, et al
as 09-4068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLAND BRISCOE
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH KLAUS, MARTIN DRAGOVICH, MILLER, Lt. and others
Michael Antonelli v. Mark Tipton, et al
as 08-3123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael C. Antonelli
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Tipton, Unit Manager, FCI- Forrest CIty, Smith, Lt., FCI - Forrest City, Patterson, Drug Treatment Specialist, FCI - Forrest City and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
